8.04.2013

KINETICS IN OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY 1

Kinetics is a branch of classical mechanics that is focused on the movements of various bodies and the forces that can act on both bodies in motion and bodies at rest. Some people confuse the term with “kinematics,” because the two words sound similar, and they both have to do with the science of motion. In fact, “kinetics” itself is an out-dated term. Scientists prefer to say “analytical dynamics” or simply “dynamics.” The science of motion in the form of kinematics relies on some very clearly-defined laws, such as the concept that an object in motion tends to remain in motion. Kinetics expands upon these laws, adding some additional principles that help to explain what happens when external forces act on an object. This branch of classical mechanics recognizes the fact that many things can influence the outcome of a series of events, ranging from whether an object is dropped or hurled, to the obstacles the object encounters on its way to a destination. Many people are unconsciously aware of the laws of kinetics, because they use them on a daily basis, whether they are tossing a dirty fork into the sink from across the kitchen or designing bridges. Kinetics application is relevance in Occupational Therapy in various ways. It is basically apply to prevent injury and improve rehabilitation in terms of technique analysis and exercise given to the client. (Smith 2013)

One specific performance areas in occupation that I chose are leisure. Leisure is a non-obligatory activity that is intrinsically motivated and engaged in during discretionary time, that is, time not committed to obligatory occupations such as work, self-care, or sleep. (American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2008). Example of leisure activities is playing basketball which involves jumping movement of human body. Jumping is acceleration of body parts upward to increase the mutual force between us and the earth above the force of body weight. Sir Isaac Newton penned three laws of motion that capture the essence of movement of bodies, human as well as inanimate. These laws have stood the test of time in our state of being close to the earth and travelling at modest speeds. One in particular, the third law, states that "action and reaction are equal and opposite." If you accelerate your arms upward, the muscular force required to do this has an equal and opposite reaction pushing the remainder of your body against the ground at your feet. The reaction to this force is that of the earth pushing up on you. When being try on your bathroom scales, you will see your weight apparently increase and decrease. The reason is that the bathroom scale is a force transducer that measures the ground reaction force. The subsequent apparent decrease in force is due to upward deceleration of the arms, which requires a downward force on the arms and an equal upward force on the remainder of the body. If our initial upward arm motion is sufficiently vigorous, the ground reaction force will go very high and subsequently drop to zero as we jump upward off our bathroom scale. This is jumping. We experience jumping as going upward because the earth is our reference for all things stable.

Kinetics knowledge can be applied in clinical practice for gait analysis of the patient. The integration of posture and movement utilizes anticipatory and reactive postural control mechanisms. The postural orientation of the individual relative to the base of support and gravity determines the movement strategies that will be accessible and effective. The alignment of body segments both at the initiation of movement and throughout the evolvement of movements plays a critical role in the postural control strategies utilized. The alignment of body segments in relation to each other and the base of support and the expression of postural control in relation to gravity and the environment are the key areas of focus in stroke rehabilitation and the treatment of other neurological conditions. (Graham et al. 2009)

One clinical case study for physical dysfunction is Pyia, who is a 75-year old woman who has treated for breast cancer 8 years earlier. She developed metastases, with an onset of acute, bilateral lower extremity weakness and loss of sensation. For 2 days she felt “unsteady” when she was walking and had one fall. By the time she was admitted to the hospital, she was unable to walk. After few weeks later, Pyia was asked to identify what areas of occupational performance were still problematic for her, what she could do well, and what her goals were. She replied that she was happy to be walking better but felt endurance was still a problem. She used the walker independently in the home but still needed assistance to get up and down stairs. (Heidi McHugh Pendleton and Winifred Schultz-Krohn. 2007) The kinetics application here can be explained by the third of Newton’s laws of motion which states that every applied force is accompanied by a reaction force. For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. During gait, every contact of foot with the floor or ground generates an upward reaction force. In the case of Pyia, she used walkers instead of her own foot due to the physical dysfunction. The upward reaction force is generated to the Pyia’s walkers while she walks instead of her foot.  The weight of Pyia is distributed over the walker so that she can also have good postural control while walking and maintain a stable gait with respect to the force from the ground.

One of biomechanics instrumentation for kinetics application is the use of dynamometer.  The client should be seated with the shoulder adducted and neutrally rotated, the elbow flexed at 90 degrees, forearm in neutral position, and wrist between 0 and 30 degrees extension between 0 and 15 degrees of ulnar deviation. It is important for the client to have an appropriate position while the therapist is taking the joint measurement of the patient. The force against gravity to the weight of the client can affect the reading of the grip strength of the dynamometer. Dynamometer is a device for measuring mechanical force, or power, transmitted by a rotating shaft. Since power is the product of torque (turning force) and angular speed, all power-measuring dynamometers are essentially torque-measuring devices; the shaft speed is measured separately. Among force-measuring devices are a flexible metallic ring that bends when a force is applied in such a manner as to tend to collapse it—the amount of bending being a measure of the applied force—and a hydraulic “load cell” that measures compressive loads in terms of fluid pressure. (Encyclopaedia Britannica 2013) A dynamometer has been designed for measuring isometric forces in human body limb segments.

Isokinetic contraction is the muscular contraction that accompanies constant velocity limb movements around a joint. The velocity of movement is maintained constant by a special dynamometer. The resistance of the dynamometer is equal to the muscular forces applied throughout the range of movement. This method allows the measurement of the muscular forces in dynamic conditions and provides optimal loading of the muscles . However, during movements in the vertical plane, the torque registered by the dynamometer is the resultant torque produced by the muscular and gravitational forces. The error depends on the angular position and the torque potential of the tested muscle group. Several methods have been developed for the correction of gravitational errors in isokinetic data. The torque output also contains artefacts that are associated with the inertial forces during acceleration and deceleration periods before the development of the constant pre-set angular velocity. For an accurate assessment of muscle function, only constant velocity data should be analysed.

The most frequently used isokinetic parameters are the maximum torque and the angular position where it was recorded, the torque output at different angular velocities of movement, the torque ratio of reciprocal muscle groups and the torque output during repeated contractions. The unique features of isokinetic dynamometry are optimal loading of the muscles in dynamic conditions and constant preselected velocity of movement. These features provide safety in the rehabilitation ofpatients with muscular and ligamentous injuries. Isokinetic dynamometry has also been used for the training of various muscle groups in order to improve the muscular performance in dynamic conditions. The movement velocity of different activities can be simulated during training in order to improve the training effect. Data acquisition and analysis have been improved by using computer systems interfaced to isokinetic dynamometers. Recently developed computer systems provide correction for gravitational and inertial errors, accurate computation of isokinetic parameters and real-time display of the torque output .


In a nut shell, knowledge of kinetics is important in Occupational Therapy practice. It is basically apply to prevent injury and improve rehabilitation in terms of technique analysis and exercise given to the client. Therapist observes the client’s movement and relates it to the ground or gravitational force with respect to the mass or weight of the client. Any postural impairments or physical dysfunction can affect the result of the client’s areas of occupation and performance areas respectively. The conditions face by the client should also being include in other to identify the best technique will be given to the client.

credit


AVAILABILITY, RELIABILITY, VALIDITY OF AMPS 2

REFERENCES

Ay-Woan Pan & Fisher, A.G. 1994. The Assessment of Motor and Process Skills of Persons With Psychiatric Disorders. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 48(9): 775-780

Bernspång, B. & Fisher, A.G. 1995. Validation of the Assessment of Motor and Process       Skills for Use in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2(1): 3-9

Doble, S.E., Fisk, J.D., Fisher, A.G., Ritvo, P.G. & Murray, T.J. 1994. Functional      competence of Community-Dwelling Persons with Multiple Sclerosis Using the Assessment of Motor and    Process Skills. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 75(8):843-851

Doble, S.E., Fisk, J.D., Lewis, N., Rockwood & Kenneth. 1999. Test-Retest Reliability of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills in Elderly Adults. Occupational Therapy                 Journal of Research. 19(3): 203-215

Fisher, A. G. 1993. The assessment of IADL motor skills: An application of many-faceted   Rasch analysis. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 47: 319–329

Fisher, A.G. & Jones, K.B. 2010. Assessment of Motor and Process Skills. Development,     Standardization, and Administration Manual. 7th Ed. Fort Collins, CO: Three Star Press
Hebert, R. & Brayne, C. 1995. Epidemiology of Vascular Dementia. Neuroepidemiology. 14(5): 240-57

Kirkley, K. N. & Fisher, A. G. 1999. Alternate Forms Reliability of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills. Journal of Outcome Measurement. 3(1): 53-70

Lockhart, B.P & Lestage, P.J. 2003. Cognition Enhancing or Neuroprotective Compounds for the Treatment of Cognitive Disorders. Why? When? Which? Exp Gerontol. 38:119-128

McAdam, K., Thomas, W. & Chard, G. 2001. The Assessment of Motor and Process Skills: an Evaluation of the Impact of Training on Service Delivery. The British Journal of            Occupational Therapy. 64(7): 357-363(7)

McNulty, M.C. & Fisher, A.G. 2001. Validity of Using the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills to Estimate Overall Home Safety in Persons with Psychiatric Conditions. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy. : Official Publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association. 55(6):649-655

Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada. 2008. Key Facts for Those Affected by Multiple Sclerosis. Transl. Andree Maisonneuve. Canada: Arcade Press Ltd.

Oakley, F. & Sunderland, T. 1997. International Psychogeriatric. Journal of Assessment of Motor and Process Skills as a Measure of IADL Functioning in PharmacologicStudies of People With    Alzheimer's Disease: A Pilot Study. 2(9): 197-206



AVAILABILITY, RELIABILITY, VALIDITY OF AMPS 1

The type and extend of use of occupational-based assessment in Occupational Therapy practice. Availability, Reliability, and Validity.

            The type of occupational-based assessment in Occupational Therapy practice that I choose is Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS). Fisher and Jones (2010) explain that the AMPS is an innovative observational evaluation designed to be used by occupational therapists to evaluate the quality of a person’s performance of activities of daily living (ADL) in natural, task-relevant environments. However, studies also proved that the mechanism of AMPS can also be applied in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL). AMPS are another type of assessment besides Modified Barthel Index and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure which can be used to evaluate change in occupational performance problems over time.

Fisher and Jones (2010) shows that the unique design of the AMPS allows the occupational therapist to compare the quality of performance of a person who performed different AMPS tasks each time he or she was evaluated. In a like manner, the AMPS can be used to compare performance among groups of persons who each performed a different set of AMPS tasks. The AMPS provides occupational therapists with a powerful and sensitive tool that can assist in planning effective interventions and documenting the effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions. The AMPS provides a vocabulary that the occupational therapist can use to describe the quality of a person’s occupational performance — what and how a person does what he or she needs and wants to do, given the demands of the ADL task and the resources and demands of the physical and social environment. Thus, the patient’s limitations can also be analysing by using this type of assessment as well as to prepare the occupational therapist in planning the next interventions to be given suitable for the patient.

McAdam et al. (2001) conduct a study involving thirty-six occupational therapists that completed a training course on the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS), held in the West Midlands, took part in a follow-up evaluation. This examined the effectiveness of the AMPS training on the occupational therapy service delivery. Twenty-eight structured interviews were carried out with occupational therapists from the West Midlands region and eight postal questionnaires returned from occupational therapists outside the region. The outcome indicated that observation skills had improved and that the AMPS was an appropriate tool to use for the purposes of assessment, guiding intervention and measuring outcomes of occupational therapy. There were variations in the ease with which the AMPS was administered with different client groups, but 89% of the occupational therapists were still using the AMPS at 9 months following training across a range of services. The main difficulties encountered were a lack of access to a computer and the additional support needed for the AMPS to be fully integrated into clinical practice. The adaptability of the AMPS as a standardised assessment and outcome measure makes it a good choice of tool to use across an occupational therapy service.

The reliability of this assessment is proved by Oakley and Sunderland (1997) which help to explain the usefulness of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) as an outcome measure of instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) in pharmacologic studies of people with Alzheimer's disease. The AMPS simultaneously measures motor and process skills and their effect on the ability of the person to perform familiar IADL tasks. They administered the AMPS to 11 Alzheimer inpatients in a 31/2-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of fluoxetine and selegiline administered as single agents and in combination with physostigmine. Results indicated that there was a significant difference in IADL ability among study conditions for process skills, but not for motor skills, thereby suggesting that the AMPS is useful as a sensitive outcome measure of IADL ability in drug trials with this population.

Lockhart and Lestage (2003) state that dementia is generally defined as “a state of serious emotional and intellectual deterioration” and affects memory, language, visuospatial skills, cognition and personality. Its prevalence increases markedly after 75 years of age; making it a disease of older persons. Hebert and Brayne (1995) proved that Alzheimer disease (AD), a progressive neurodegenerative disease, is one of the most prominent forms of dementia and accounts for 70% of all cases. The prevalence of AD has been estimated  to double every 5 years after the age of 65 and rises to 47% in people over 85 years of  age.

Besides that, Kirkley and Fisher (1999) proved that the alternate-forms reliability of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) where alternate forms means different pairs of AMPS tasks, was studied with 91 people who have who had performed four AMPS tasks. Results support use of the AMPS activities of daily-living motor and process scales.  In addition to that, Doble et al. (1999) proved the findings of a study of 55 elderly adults support the test-retest reliability of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills, it illustrate the utility of alternative methods for examining the reliability of individual subjects' measures, and indicate that not all test-retest differences represent measurement error.

Moreover, another Doble et al. (1994) journal also proved the use of AMPS. The journal explain the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) is an observational measure of functional competence in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) that was designed to overcome the limitations of self-reports and proxy reports. The AMPS allows simultaneous evaluation of the underlying motor and process (organizational/adaptive) skills necessary for competent task performance. They examined the IADL performance of 22 community-dwelling patients with mild to moderate Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in comparison to nondisabled subjects matched for age and gender. Functional competence of the MS subjects, as measured by the AMPS, was poorer than that of the control group. Many MS subjects who would not have been expected to have IADL difficulties on the basis of ratings of neurologic impairment were impaired in their IADL performance. For some patients, IADL impairment reflected deficits in their motor and process skills, whereas for others, process skill impairments alone were responsible for deficient task performance.

Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada (2008) explains that Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a disease that may affect the brain, spinal cord and optic nerves (central nervous system). MS is thought to be an autoimmune illness, which means that the immune system incorrectly identifies the body’s own tissue as a target of attack. In the case of MS, the immune system attack affects myelin, the fatty coating that protects the nerve fibres of the central nervous system. Damaged myelin may form scar tissue (sclerosis). Often the nerve fibre itself may be affected. When any part of the myelin coating or nerve fibre is damaged, messages moving through the central nervous system can be disrupted. Damaged areas are often called “lesions” or “plaques”.

McNulty and Fisher (2001) explain the validity of this assessment by evaluating the ability in activities of daily living (ADL) of 20 participants with the AMPS before discharge from an inpatient psychiatric unit. Within approximately two weeks of their discharge, the participants' home safety was evaluated within their home settings using the Safety Assessment of Function and the Environment for Rehabilitation. To form a basis for comparison, a second administration of the AMPS was administered concurrently with the home safety evaluation. Moderate positive relationships were found between ADL motor and ADL process ability and home safety in both the clinic and the home; however, analyses of the sensitivity, specificity, and overall predictive values revealed that home ADL process ability was the best predictor of home safety for participants who were categorized as less safe in the study. Findings suggest that clinic ADL evaluations using the AMPS give a reasonable estimate of home safety for participants categorized as having more home safety risk. For participants categorized as having less home safety risk, clinic ADL evaluation using the AMPS produced significantly less accurate estimates than ADL evaluations conducted in the home. These results indicate that home safety estimates may be most accurate if they are based on home rather than clinic ADL process ability measures.

Bernspång and Fisher (1995) conduct a study on the validation of the AMPS for use in Sweden. AMPS is an observational assessment of the extent to which motor and process skill deficits impact on domestic or instrumental daily living task performance (IADL). The validity of the AMPS scales was evaluated in terms of (a) unidimensionality of the items and tasks that comprise each scale, (b) person response validity, and (c) the ability of the scales to differentiate among clients of varying levels of functional ability. The results of a multi-faceted Rasch analysis revealed overall scale and individual response validity of both AMPS scales. The AMPS motor and process scales also differentiated significantly between clients who were judged to be independent, to require minimal assistance, or moderate to maximum assistance in order to live in the community. The results of this study support the validity of using the AMPS evaluation technique in Sweden.

Ay-Woan Pan and Fisher (1994) also proved the validity of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) by evaluating a heterogeneous sample of subjects with psychiatric disorders. Sixty subjects, ranging in age from 16 to 72 years, participated in this study; 30 were persons without disorders living in the community; 30 had diagnosed psychiatric disorders. Two univariate F tests were used to test the hypothesis that mean AMPS measures would differ significantly between the group with and the group without psychiatric disorders. The hypothesis was supported for both AMPS motor and process scale measures. As would be expected among a sample that includes many higher functioning persons, many subjects with psychiatric disorders did just as well as subjects in the group without psychiatric disorders. Motor as well as process skill abilities of persons with psychiatric disorders were evaluated. Because the AMPS provides more specific features than other global functional instruments, it can help clinicians plan treatment and intervention more effectively. Further examination of the motor and process skill deficits within and among diagnostic subgroups and of the effect of medication and prolonged hospitalization on AMPS motor and process abilities is indicated.

In conclusion, AMPS is a suitable occupational-based assessment in Occupational Therapy practice because it has evidence of availability, reliability and validity. The assessment of occupational performance can take place at different stages of the occupational therapy process (such as initial referral or during the intervention process) and in different settings (such as in the client’s home, school, hospital, community locations). Assessment is necessary to establish a baseline of a client’s occupational performance skills which may include activities of daily living such as play and leisure, self-care and etc. on which service planning and therapy intervention can be based. Assessment is vital to inform our decisions regarding specific clients and programs.

credit

ACTIVITY ANALYSIS 3

REFERENCES

Allen, C.K. 1987. Activity: Occupational Therapy’s Treatment Method. American Journal of        Occupational Therapy. 9(41): 563-575

American Occupational Therapy Association. 2007. Specialized Knowledge and Skills in              Feeding, Eating, and Swallowing for Occupational Therapy Practice. American         Journal of Occupational Therapy. 61: 686-700

Earley, D., Herlache, E., & Skelton, D.R. 2010. Use of Occupations and Activities in a                 Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Program: A Musician’s Triumphs   Over Chronic Hemiparesis From Stroke. American Journal of Occupational Therapy.  5(64): 735-744

Fidler, G.S. & Velde, B.P. 1999. Activities: Reality and Symbol. Deciphering the Messsage:        The Activity Analysis. SLACK Incorporated

Fisher, A.G. 1998. Uniting Practice and Theory in an Occupational Framework. American            Journal of Occupational Therapy. 7(52): 509-521

Neistadt, M.E., McAuley, D., Zecha, D., & Shannon, R. 1993. An Analysis of a Board Game      as a Treatment Activity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2(47): 154-160

Sietsema, J.M., Nelson, D.L., Mulder, R.M., Mervau-Scheidel, D., & White, B.E. 1993. The         Use of a Game to Promote Arm Reach in Persons With Traumatic Brain Injury.           American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1(47): 19-24

Steinback, T.M. 1986. Purposeful Activity and Performance. American Journal of                         Occupational Therapy. 8(40): 529-534

Trombly, C.A. 1995. Occupation: Purposefulness and Meaningfulness as Therapeutic                    Mechanisms. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 10(49): 960-972


ACTIVITY ANALYSIS 2

Explain one of the activity analysis that can be taken.

            One of the activities that can be used to apply the terminologies of activity analysis is make a cup of hot coffee. Components of the task include; a cup is on the table with the coffee solute, put hot water into the cup, take the spoon and gently stir the ingredients in that cup with an anticlockwise repeated rotation, put a few of warm water into the cup and then stir again gently with an anticlockwise repeated rotation, sit down on the chair and drink. Steps of activity being analysed is stirring the coffee. Equipment and supplies necessary for this activity is a cup, a spoon, a coffee sachet, hot and warm water, table and chair.

            A sink and other kitchen materials should be available in the work area. There should be ample room around the work table so that the performer is not crowded and can move freely between the table and the drawer up over the head of the performer on the wall of the kitchen. Lighting should be adequate for clear visualization of equipment involve and work area. Position of the performer in relation to the work surface and equipment: The performer is standing beside the table, at a comfortable distance for reaching and manipulating the tools involved. The cup is centred in front of the performer, and the spoon and hot/warm water bowl are right and near the cup. Starting position of the performer: Standing erect; shoulders are slightly abducted, bringing both hands to the center work place; elbows are flexed respectively. Movement of pattern used to perform the steps under analysis: Thumb radial abduction, flexion of the metacarpophalangeal (MP) and interphalangeal (IP) joints of index and middle fingers; flexion and extension of thumb while stirring. A fine motor or manual skill is use when the performer hold the spoon while stirring the coffee. After a moment, the spoon is release and the action of stirring is stop for a while.

            Tactile input or need for discrimination of temperature or texture is use when the performer needs to put hot/warm water into the cup, taking the spoon, a cup, and a sachet of coffee. She need to determine the temperature of the water either it is hot or vice versa. For proprioceptive joint motion and position sense, the performer received sensory modality by being aware of joint position and motion during stirring. Vestibular (balance, sense of body, head motion) can be received by maintaining standing posture while performing activity. Visual sensory modality is received when the performer seeing the equipment such as a cup, a spoon and also the environment she involve in. Olfactory smell of sensory modality received by smelling a slight odor of coffee. Pain sensory modality is received while the performer reaching out the hot water to be put into the cup.

            The directions of making a cup of coffee is complex because the performer need to identify a lot of different types of things such as a cup, water, a spoon, a sachet of coffee where all of these have variety in shape, colour, texture and temperature respectively. The performer need to memorize the stirring activity as it is use frequently in this activity. Concentration and attention required is moderate. The performer focuses on the cup and knows when the spoon slightly hit the wall of the cup. The repeated sequence of stirring is in an anticlockwise direction.

The activity analysis involve in making a cup of coffee in this activity focuses on the activity of stirring and determining the temperature of the water. This activity is vital for the performer to distinguish between different types of temperature, texture and smell. The action of stirring is one of the steps to be taken before the performer to have a drink.  Thus, the act of stirring can help the performer to engage in an activity of daily living (ADL) like eating. According to American Occupational Therapy Association (2007), eating is the ability to keep and manipulate food or fluid in the mouth and swallow it; eating and swallowing are often used interchangeably. The understanding of the activity analysis of this activity can be expand by identifying the properties inherent in a given occupation, task or activity, as well as the skills, abilities and capacities required to complete it.

credit